Wednesday, July 28, 2021
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Wednesday, July 14, 2021
confetti phrase / EZE, 2021
Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Sunday, July 11, 2021
Saturday, July 10, 2021
Tuesday, July 6, 2021
Asemic Maps / Cece Chapman, 2021
Asemic Maps,
or
Where Is Virgil When You Need Him?
Dante
The Asemic Journey: Being Lost, Mostly
Thursday, July 1, 2021
Michael Jacobson Interview by Beth Kingston-Lee for Utsanga
I was interviewed by Beth Kingston-Lee over at Utsanga: https://www.utsanga.it/jacobson-kingston-lee-michael-jacobson-interview-by-beth-kingston-lee/
Saturday, June 26, 2021
Tuesday, June 22, 2021
Post-Asemic Press: Glyphs of Uncertain Meaning by Tim Gaze is availab...
Saturday, June 19, 2021
bokeh, asemics / EZE, 2021
Sunday, June 13, 2021
Saturday, June 5, 2021
William Kentridge: The Gap of Meaning: Between Clarity and Forgetfulness, A Making Toward
William Kentridge: Thinking on One's Feet - A Walking Tour of the Studio
How is meaning dependent on memory? How is memory a blockchain of its process?
In this video, William Kentridge explores the flux of making, how the defined becomes undefined, and the undefined becomes defined.
How does his discussion translate to asemics? Not that this question is necessary, but the answer does provide a kind of map for those willing to make this journey.
The approach Kentridge takes very much follows the Lockean assemblage, the Hegelian Aufhebung, and the Derridean contest of the between. This between, this gap, defines the relationship Kentridge sees, for example, between disassembly and collage as well as other dialectical proxies (between ... and ...) in this process.
And here? For asemics, ... rejects the {} interpretation, and for pansemics, .. accepts {all} interpretation while desemantics makes for a kind of {directional} Aufhebung.