Saturday, December 30, 2023
trertoorte / EZE, 2023
ertoorte / EZE, 2023
Friday, December 29, 2023
osjert / EZE, 2023
Thursday, December 28, 2023
osfert / EZE, 2023
Wednesday, December 27, 2023
Asemic Science? A Map of the Brain / nature.com, 2023
from nature.com: Largest Map of the Human Brain Thus Far
Where Are the McDonalds? (Same Link as Above, but with an Asemic Preface)
What is the Theme Music?
Monday, December 25, 2023
ufert / EZE, 2023
either neither / EZE, 2023
Sunday, December 24, 2023
Metamodern Asemics / EZE, 2023
Metamodern Asemics
Robin van den Akker and Timotheus Vermeulen Discuss Metamodernism
Getting Metamodernism Closer to Asemics
with Such Terms as Walllessness and Borderlessness
The Future of Theory
Metamodern
Semiotics Guise
Worldview and The Future of Theory
Sunday in the Park with Theory
...
A Note on Time Decay
Doped
is here there / EZE, 2023
Saturday, December 23, 2023
The Words of the Prophets Are Not Words
Friday, December 22, 2023
Kitsch Asemic / EZE, 2023
Erik J. Larson on Kitsch
Asemic at the End of the World
And Other Kitsch
And a Features List of Metamodern Aesthetics
Where
Asemics Is Not (Yet) Included, But ~Pastiche~, a Cousin of Kitsch, Is
~ Under Investigation ~
(Science as Kitsch?)
Saturday, December 16, 2023
The Quus toward an Asemic Condition / EZE, 2023
The Quus toward an Asemic Condition
57 + 68 = 125
57 + 68 = 5
This is just as well art:
57 + 68
So too these statements:
57 + 68 = 125
57 + 68 = 5
There may be a shout for explanation.
There may not.
There may be an auto-correction.
There may not.
Indeed, the semantics of these statements may or may not produce much of any kind of truth.
They could also bring about a bit of confusion, but confusion requires something ... .
And did you notice?
Just confusion?
An attempt to intervene for the sake of clarity.
And there may even be statement denial.
There may not.
But history is another kind of collection, true or not.
As we live in these conditions now, we make our conditions norms, and norms serve as our rules whether our rules call for compliance or call for change or call for definition ... or call for something or other ... but then, what happens next?
Else-wise, the asemic condition often escapes such activity. For meaning in this way, the asemic condition usually lacks.
Soon enough, philosophy engages the asemic condition and blurts out "paradox."
But no paradox is likely here as silence too belongs to music.
Yet the intervention begins, sort of.
And will the intervention allow for the asemic condition? or move to meaning?
What is it?
Kripkenstein Denies an Appeal to Rule-Following for Private Language
Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language
Postscript