Notebook 920, Dave Read, 2023

 

Asemics as Some Sort of Technology: The Return of Theuth and Thamus / EZE, 2023

 Some Sort of Technology of Writing?

As a kind of writing, is asemics a technology?

Some Sort of Technology of Writing?

street sign / EZE, 2023

 

:HMMMJ / GARY BARWIN / 2023

 

Generators for Asemic Writing / EZE, 2023

 Generators for Asemic Writing

Oliver Hofkens: Creative Coding

Federico Federici: Talk at Cambridge Creation Lab

lowerlevelletters / EZE, 2023

 

V Circuit / Dave Read / 2023

 

vowel / EZE, 2023

 

sig / EZE, 2022

 

L.E.D. Braille / EZE 2022

 

type face/EZE, 2022

 

particulate / EZE, 2022

 

One More Strategy for the Meaningless / EZE, 2022

The way Terry Eagleton reads T.S. Eliot is as a split text: at least one level of meaningless/at least one level of collective (un)consciousness. With asemics and polysemics and the interplay between them, we often have a single source of text and thereby an interplay of meaning/not meaning on what is usually a single plane. But the split Eagleton invokes gives us another textual problem: the identity of the text under interpretation. And this split creates yet another problem: the prioritization of the interpretation(s). 

See what you think:

Poetry was not to engage the reader's mind: it did not really matter what a poem actually meant, and Eliot professed himself to be quite unperturbed by apparently outlandish interpretations of his own work. Meaning was no more than a sop thrown to the reader to keep him distracted, while the poem went stealthily to work on him in more physical and unconscious ways ... . (Terry Eagleton: Literary Theory: An Introduction, 35) 

frain, the asemic of a musical score / EZE, 2022

 

sport / EZE, 2022