Monday, April 6, 2026

On an Asemics of AI Conceptualization - Cosmic Agrarianism / EZE, 2026

Prompt: What might be the tenets of a Gnostic Zoroastrianism based on the Farmer's Almanac as a book of prophecy, allowing for five percent error?

AI:

A Gnostic Zoroastrianism rooted in the Farmer’s Almanac as a book of prophecy would likely center on a "Cosmic Agrarianism." This faith would view the seasonal cycles of the physical world as a coded, rhythmic battle between light (order/growth) and dark (chaos/decay), with the Almanac serving as the revealed "Gnosis" of these hidden patterns.

Core Tenets of the Almanac-Gnosis

  • The Dualism of Frost and Harvest: Like the traditional Zoroastrian battle between Ahura Mazda and Ahriman, this faith posits a struggle between the Wise Grower and the Entropic Frost. The Farmer's Almanac serves as the "Sacred Liturgy," mapping the ebb and flow of this cosmic war through weather forecasts and solar cycles.
  • Asha as Seasonal Alignment: In Zoroastrianism, Asha is the divine order. In this Gnostic variant, Asha is "Living in Rhythm" with the sky and soil. Deviation from the Almanac’s "Best Days" (for planting, pruning, or even hair coloring) is seen as falling into the "Druj" (the Lie), which leads to failed harvests and spiritual disharmony.
  • The Five-Percent Margin of Error (The "Stain" of Matter): The belief acknowledges that the physical world is "dualistic on a monistic background" or slightly corrupted. A five-percent error rate in prophecy is not a failure but a theological necessity—it represents the unpredictable friction of the material realm that the soul must navigate to reach the "unblemished Light".
  • Gnosis through Observation: Salvation is found not through blind faith, but through the active "knowledge" (Gnosis) of planetary positions, moon phases, and natural folklore. Observing signs like "early frog calls" or "thick bird nests" is a form of prophetic forthtelling, revealing the spiritual state of the coming months.
  • Ritual Purity through Stewardship: Spiritual purity is maintained through practical deeds—what the Old Farmer's Almanac calls "Gardening by the Moon". Following the "Moral Maxim" of Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds translates into ensuring proper drainage, rotating crops, and managing moisture—acts that protect the world from the "root rot" of the dark principle.

The Role of the "Prophet"

In this system, the editors of the Almanac act as Covenant Executors, calling the wayward back to the rhythm of the seasons. They do not just predict; they interpret the "present circumstances" of nature in light of humanity's relationship with the Earth's divine cycles.


Would you like to explore how specific seasonal festivals in this faith might be timed based on the 2026 astrological moon signs?

On an Asemics of Computer Humanism / EZE, 2026

On Automated Humanities

On Humanities Badly

On Humanism after the Algorithm

On Humanities without Human

On Critique a la Anti-Humanism

On Thought Virus


AI:

Humanism is a non-religious, progressive life stance that emphasizes human dignity, reason, and compassion, placing paramount importance on human welfare rather than divine authority. It advocates for using science, free inquiry, and ethical living to solve human problems, build a better world, and maximize happiness in this life. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key pillars of humanism include:

  • Non-theistic: A focus on human agency, rejecting supernatural beliefs or religious dogma.
  • Reason & Science: Reliance on empirical evidence, skepticism, and critical thinking to understand the world.
  • Ethics & Compassion: The belief that morality is an innate human capability, driven by kindness, empathy, and responsibility to others.
    Human Rights & Democracy: Advocacy for freedom, autonomy, and equal rights for all individuals.
Origins and Types
  • Renaissance Humanism: Originated in 13th-14th century Italy, focusing on classical studies (literature, history, philosophy) to improve human potential.
  • Modern Humanism: A 20th-century secular, scientific, and ethical philosophy that emphasizes human responsibility for the future of humanity.
  • Religious Humanism: Practiced within groups like Unitarian Universalism and Ethical Culture, which combine humanist ethics with community-based, non-theistic celebrations. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Humanists hold that because this life is the only one we know, human beings must accept responsibility for their own lives and the kind of world in which they live. [1]


AI:

Accelerated Humanism is not a widely recognized, singular academic term, but rather a conceptual intersection between accelerationism (the drive to rapidly accelerate technological and capitalist processes) and humanism (the focus on human potential, rationality, and well-being). [1, 2]
Based on the search results, this concept likely refers to one of two main, sometimes contradictory, approaches to humanity's future in the age of AI and advanced technology:


1. Left-Accelerationism ("Inhumanism" / Prometheanism) [1]
This perspective uses accelerationist theory to push humanism beyond its current biological and social limitations. [1]

  • Rationalist Inhumanism: Thinkers like Reza Negarestani and Peter Wolfendale advocate for using reason to transform humans into something else, discarding limitations indexed to Homo sapiens biology.
  • Prometheanism: This view holds that there are no immutable limits on what humans can achieve. It encourages using technology to surpass human limitations, often de-prioritizing the "flesh-and-blood" human in favor of a "posthuman" future.
  • Technological Emancipation: This branch aims to leverage technology to free humanity from the constraints of capitalism, labor, and biological limitations. [1, 2]
2. "Effective Accelerationism" (e/acc) or Techno-Humanism
This approach focuses on using accelerating technology to maximize human welfare and solve existential problems. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Pro-Human Welfare: Techno-humanism, as described by researchers like Jason Crawford, posits that science and technology are tools that ultimately promote human flourishing.
  • Effective Accelerationism (e/acc): This movement advocates for accelerating technological progress, particularly Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), to solve human problems like poverty, war, and climate change.
  • Humanist Superintelligence: This involves utilizing AI to enhance human capabilities and enhance global GDP, effectively "levelling up" humanity. [1, 2, 3]
Summary of Differences
  • Left-Accelerationist view: Aims to change what it means to be human (posthumanism/inhumanism).
  • Techno-Humanist view: Aims to use technology to improve the lives of current humans (techno-humanist welfare). [1, 2]
Note: In the context of the search results, traditional accelerationism is often described as inherently "antihumanist" or "posthumanist," seeking to eventually move beyond humanity. [1]

blup / EZE, 2026


 

Sunday, April 5, 2026

An Asemics of Thought as Contagion / EZE, 2026

~ *** ~

On Thought Contagion in Political Rhetoric (AI):

In political rhetoric, thought contagion (often discussed as emotional or moral contagion) is the process by which ideas, attitudes, and behaviors spread rapidly through an electorate, often bypassing conscious deliberation. Politicians leverage this by using specific "primes"—such as anger, fear, or moralized language—to trigger automatic, unconscious responses that sync a crowd's or online network's feelings with their own. [1, 2, 3]
Key ways it is used in political rhetoric include:

  • Emotional Priming: Politicians use "anger cues" in speeches and advertisements to increase voter interest and mobilization. Moderate voters, who are typically less engaged, are often the most susceptible to these emotional shifts.
  • Moralized Language: Messages containing words like "wrong," "evil," or "immoral" are more likely to be shared on social media, a phenomenon known as moral contagion. This creates "echo chambers" where ideas spread quickly within ideologically similar groups.
  • The "Enemy" Metaphor: By framing issues like immigration or public health through metaphors of "war," "battles," or "alien invaders," leaders can create a sense of urgent, shared threat that triggers collective anxiety and protective group behavior.
  • Disgust and Social Exclusion: Rhetoric that links certain groups or ideas to "disease" or "contamination" (as seen in historical eugenic discourses or modern xenophobic rhetoric) uses the contagion heuristic to justify restrictive policies or social displacement.
  • Populist Messaging: Populist rhetoric often becomes "contagious" when establishment parties adopt anti-elite messaging to compete for voters, spreading these themes across the entire political spectrum regardless of original ideology.
  • Digital Amplification: Social media algorithms prioritize high-arousal content (like anger or outrage), which acts as a digital "vector" for contagion, allowing political narratives to shift or dominate public perception almost instantly. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]

~ *** ~

On Herd Mentality

On Understanding Herd Mentality

On Gustave Le Bon 

On The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind by Gustave Le Bon


Against a Herd Logic, Contra Le Bon


On Mass Hysteria



~ *** ~


On Thought Contagion


On Thought Contagion


On Thought Contagion (AI):

"Thought contagion" refers to the rapid spread of ideas, beliefs, or emotions from person to person, often acting like a virus within a population. These contagious ideas, whether positive or negative, can influence behaviors, create collective action, and even transmit mental states like anxiety or political ideologies through social interaction. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Key aspects of "Thought as Contagion" include:

  • Social Contagion Theory: Popularized by figures like Gustave LeBon, this concept suggests that individuals in crowds are susceptible to adopting the moods and thoughts of others, often resulting in irrational actions.
  • Emotional Contagion: Behaviors and emotions like fear, depression, or even joy can be transmitted unconsciously, such as catching a smile or absorbing a friend's anxiety.
  • Ideology and Misinformation: In modern contexts, this refers to how harmful ideas, false information, or extreme viewpoints spread rapidly through media and social networks.
  • Psychological Impact: Exposure to specific ideas, such as conspiracy theories, can directly increase paranoid thinking and alter personal mindsets, as noted in studies on the spread of misinformation and social beliefs. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Thought Contagion in Popular Culture
The concept was notably explored by the band Muse in their 2018 single "Thought Contagion." The song highlights how divisive or incorrect ideologies can become powerful and contagious in modern society, suggesting that modern culture acts as a "brain cleanse" that spreads misinformation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Scientific Basis
Studies have demonstrated the transmission of emotional states in both humans and animals, showing that negative states like fear and depression can be transmitted through prolonged exposure to an infected individual. Social psychology also supports that mental frameworks (like fixed vs. growth mindsets) can be transmitted between peers. [1, 2, 3, 4
Richard Dawkins makes a case for thought contagion by applying the principles of Darwinian natural selection to human culture, proposing that ideas—or "memes"—behave as self-replicating, parasitic entities that spread through human minds like viruses. Introduced in The Selfish Gene (1976) and expanded in "Viruses of the Mind" (1991), his argument suggests that ideas survive based on their ability to spread, not necessarily on their truthfulness. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Core Components of Dawkins' Thought Contagion Case:
  • Memes as Cultural Replicators: Dawkins coined the term "meme" to define a unit of cultural transmission (an idea, catchphrase, melody, or belief) that behaves as a "replicator," analogous to genes. These units compete for limited brain space and resources, with the most infectious memes surviving and proliferating, often regardless of their utility.
  • The "Virus of the Mind" Analogy: Dawkins argues that certain sets of ideas—specifically religious doctrines or dogmas—propagate through "epidemiology, not evidence". He characterizes them as "mind viruses" because they are designed to bypass critical thinking and ensure their own survival by being passed from person to person.
  • Propagation Mechanisms: Similar to biological viruses, these "memeplexes" (complexes of compatible memes) often spread via imitation or by appealing to human anxieties, such as the fear of death.
  • The "Extended Phenotype" Framework: In The Extended Phenotype (1982), Dawkins suggests that just as a parasite can control the behavior of its host to aid its own transmission, cultural memes can influence human behavior to facilitate their transfer to other brains.
  • Distinction from Scientific Ideas: Dawkins contrasts memetic "contagion" (like faith) with scientific ideas, stating that science is constrained by evidence and methodology, whereas belief contagions thrive in the absence of evidence. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
His work has been highly influential, leading to the development of "memetics" and inspiring works by other proponents of thought contagion, such as Aaron Lynch and Susan Blackmore. [1, 2]

~ *** ~

On Gary Varvel

GaryVarvel.com

On Gary Varvel (AI):

The recent work of editorial cartoonist Gary Varvel argues that modern ideologies and cultural shifts function as forms of "thought contagion"—ideas that spread through society like a virus, often leading to what he views as destructive outcomes. [1, 2, 3]

Varvel makes this case by illustrating how specific philosophies and digital habits can reshape public consciousness:
  • Philosophical "Normalizing": Varvel contends that the legacy of figures like Alfred Kinsey and Hugh Hefner established a "contagion" of normalized sexual behavior. In his recent essays and cartoons, he argues these philosophies "rule from the grave," continuing to influence and "infect" modern views on morality and the family unit.
  • "Brain Rot" and Social Media: A recurring theme in his latest work involves the impact of screen time and online addiction. He uses terms like "Brain Rot" and "Stupid Content" to describe how low-quality or ideological information spreads rapidly through social media, effectively bypassing critical thinking to become a collective social habit.
  • The Spreading of "Ideological Illusions": Varvel’s work often depicts what he sees as the rapid, uncritical adoption of progressive ideologies, particularly regarding gender and social justice. He portrays these as "deceptive practices" or "ideologies" that are sold to the public (especially children) and then spread through institutions like schools and medical clinics.
  • Manipulation via Propaganda: He has recently focused on figures like Edward Bernays, the "Father of Propaganda," to show how governments and media can intentionally trigger thought contagion to control the masses. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

~ *** ~

On Thought Contagion in Applied Rhetoric (AI):


Rhetoricians use the concept of thought contagion—often termed rhetorical or emotional contagion—to analyze and facilitate the rapid, affective spread of ideas, emotions, and behaviors across networks. By framing messages as infectious, they study how digital media, narratives, and metaphors create "viral" effects that shape public opinion, stir collective action, and define social realities, often leveraging emotional intensity over logical argument. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Uses of Contagion in Rhetoric:

  • Digital Viral Rhetorics: Rhetoricians analyze how social media platforms act as ecosystems for "complex contagion," where digital content (like videos or trends) spreads rapidly, binding users together through shared affective, behavioral, or somatic responses.
  • Emotional and Affective Appeals: Contagion imagery is used to craft messages that link audiences emotionally, building immediate consensus or causing a narrative to circulate rapidly through "contagious" stories.
  • Health and Risk Discourse: Rhetoricians of health and medicine examine how the language of infection and risk spreads, shaping public perception of health crises, such as COVID-19 or Ebola, and constructing the notion of the "contaminated Other" in immigration discourse.
  • Affective Rhetorics and Public Policy: By drawing on affect theory, rhetoricians analyze how visual media (such as photography) in the early 20th century were used to fuel a "rhetoric of contagion" to justify specific political or social actions.
  • Metaphor and Narrative: Scholars study how contagion works as a metaphor in literature and public discourse to express fear, guilt, or cultural anxiety, such as in plague narratives.
  • Conspiracy and Belief Transmission: Research shows that exposure to certain rhetorics, such as conspiracy theories, can foster "thought contagion" by provoking negative, intense emotions that, in turn, heighten paranoid thinking. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Rhetoricians of health and medicine, along with those studying digital culture, track how symbolic and material viral circulation can have significant real-world consequences, often bearing the residue of unequal social relations. [1]


~ *** ~

On the Affirmation of Delusion