well... two rows of aligned symbols. the symbols' size and the space length between them is more or less the same. I see order and constraint.
by the way... it's a compliment... ;)
I don't see any repeated symbol though. In this sense, this piece doesn't imitate one of the most important features of any written language: redundancy.
This is my short analysis. Focused on the processes. Not on a fixed meaning (or any meaning at all, by the way). So... there's no danger at all (concerning power).
Great!
ReplyDeleteAsemical correctness.
Constrained flow?
plus: im
ReplyDeletei
ta
t
io
a 5" piece!
ReplyDelete(maybe time is the [sweetest?] constraint)
well... two rows of aligned symbols.
ReplyDeletethe symbols' size and the space length between them is more or less the same. I see order and constraint.
by the way... it's a compliment... ;)
I don't see any repeated symbol though. In this sense, this piece doesn't imitate one of the most important features of any written language: redundancy.
thanks Bruno!! :)
ReplyDeleteThis is my short analysis. Focused on the processes. Not on a fixed meaning (or any meaning at all, by the way). So... there's no danger at all (concerning power).
ReplyDeleteCheers.
... I also like the lines on the background. :)
ReplyDelete